## The GObject messaging system

## Closures

Closures are central to the concept of asynchronous signal delivery which is widely used throughout GTK+ and GNOME applications. A closure is an abstraction, a generic representation of a callback. It is a small structure which contains three objects:

- a function pointer (the callback itself) whose prototype looks like:

      1

      return_type function_callback (… , gpointer user_data);

- the `user_data` pointer which is passed to the callback upon invocation of the closure

- a function pointer which represents the destructor of the closure: whenever the closure's refcount reaches zero, this function will be called before the closure structure is freed.

The GClosure structure represents the common functionality of all closure implementations: there exists a different closure implementation for each separate runtime which wants to use the GObject type system. [4] The GObject library provides a simple GCClosure type which is a specific implementation of closures to be used with C/C++ callbacks.

A GClosure provides simple services:

- Invocation (`g_closure_invoke`): this is what closures were created for: they hide the details of callback invocation from the callback invoker.

- Notification: the closure notifies listeners of certain events such as closure invocation, closure invalidation and closure finalization. Listeners can be registered with `g_closure_add_finalize_notifier` (finalization notification), `g_closure_add_invalidate_notifier` (invalidation notification) and `g_closure_add_marshal_guards` (invocation notification). There exist symmetric deregistration functions for finalization and invalidation events (`g_closure_remove_finalize_notifier` and `g_closure_remove_invalidate_notifier`) but not for the invocation process. [5]

### C Closures

If you are using C or C++ to connect a callback to a given event, you will either use simple GCClosures which have a pretty minimal API or the even simpler `g_signal_connect` functions (which will be presented a bit later).

`g_cclosure_new` will create a new closure which can invoke the user-provided callback_func with the user-provided `user_data` as its last parameter. When the closure is finalized (second stage of the destruction process), it will invoke the `destroy_data` function if the user has supplied one.

`g_cclosure_new_swap` will create a new closure which can invoke the user-provided `callback_func` with the user-provided `user_data` as its first parameter (instead of being the last parameter as with `g_cclosure_new`). When the closure is finalized (second stage of the destruction process), it will invoke the `destroy_data` function if the user has supplied one.

### Non-C closures (for the fearless)

As was explained above, closures hide the details of callback invocation. In C, callback invocation is just like function invocation: it is a matter of creating the correct stack frame for the called function and executing a call assembly instruction.

C closure marshallers transform the array of GValues which represent the parameters to the target function into a C-style function parameter list, invoke the user-supplied C function with this new parameter list, get the return value of the function, transform it into a GValue and return this GValue to the marshaller caller.

A generic C closure marshaller is available as `g_cclosure_marshal_generic` which implements marshalling for all function types using libffi. Custom marshallers for different types are not needed apart from performance critical code where the libffi-based marshaller may be too slow.

An example of a custom marshaller is given below, illustrating how GValues can be converted to a C function call. The marshaller is for a C function which takes an integer as its first parameter and returns void.

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25

    g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__INT (GClosure     *closure,
                                  GValue       *return_value,
                                  guint         n_param_values,
                                  const GValue *param_values,
                                  gpointer      invocation_hint,
                                  gpointer      marshal_data)
    {
      typedef void (*GMarshalFunc_VOID__INT) (gpointer     data1,
                                              gint         arg_1,
                                              gpointer     data2);
      register GMarshalFunc_VOID__INT callback;
      register GCClosure *cc = (GCClosure*) closure;
      register gpointer data1, data2;

      g_return_if_fail (n_param_values == 2);

      data1 = g_value_peek_pointer (param_values + 0);
      data2 = closure->data;

      callback = (GMarshalFunc_VOID__INT) (marshal_data ? marshal_data : cc->callback);

      callback (data1,
                g_marshal_value_peek_int (param_values + 1),
                data2);
    }

There exist other kinds of marshallers, for example there is a generic Python marshaller which is used by all Python closures (a Python closure is used to invoke a callback written in Python). This Python marshaller transforms the input GValue list representing the function parameters into a Python tuple which is the equivalent structure in Python.

[4] In practice, closures sit at the boundary of language runtimes: if you are writing Python code and one of your Python callbacks receives a signal from a GTK+ widget, the C code in GTK+ needs to execute your Python code. The closure invoked by the GTK+ object invokes the Python callback: it behaves as a normal C object for GTK+ and as a normal Python object for Python code.

[5] Closures are reference counted and notify listeners of their destruction in a two-stage process: the invalidation notifiers are invoked before the finalization notifiers.